SECTION 1

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION


down.gif (156 bytes) INTRODUCTION
down.gif (156 bytes) PROJECT OVERVIEW
down.gif (156 bytes) THE CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE
   
down.gif (156 bytes)HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
              
down.gif (156 bytes) Project History
down.gif (156 bytes) SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMANDS
    down.gif (156 bytes)FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
               down.gif (156 bytes) Planning Context
    down.gif (156 bytes)TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LINKAGE
    down.gif (156 bytes)CAPACITY AND DEMAND
                down.gif (156 bytes)Two Lane Versus Four Lanes Analysis
down.gif (156 bytes)SUMMARY OF NEEDS
    down.gif (156 bytes)IMPORTANCE OF THE BRIDGE OF LIONS

    down.gif (156 bytes)STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL DEFICIENCIES
    down.gif (156 bytes)NAVIGATIONAL AND VEHICULAR SAFETY ISSUES
down.gif (156 bytes) CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BRIDGE OF LIONS
   
down.gif (156 bytes)STRUCTURAL CONDITION
              
down.gif (156 bytes)Recent Maintenance History
   
down.gif (156 bytes)DESIGN DEFICIENCIES
   
down.gif (156 bytes)SAFETY AND EVACUATION
   
down.gif (156 bytes)NAVIGATION
              
down.gif (156 bytes)Channel Data
              
down.gif (156 bytes)Ship Traffic
              
down.gif (156 bytes)Ship Impacts

INTRODUCTION

The historic Bridge of Lions is an integral part of both the St. Augustine and eastern St. Johns County transportation system. Economically, the bridge provides a critical link between Anastasia Island and the historic downtown area, which comprise the tax bases for the city. Maintaining this important crossing is essential to the continued success of emergency evacuation measures on Anastasia Island and to the economic stability of historic St. Augustine and the surrounding environs.

The purpose of this Environmental Impact Study is to evaluate ways to solve the existing substandard condition of the Bridge of Lions. The bridge is listed by the FDOT as being structurally deficient and functionally obsolete, and is subject to constant repair leading to the current weight restrictions being placed on the bridge. Other deficiencies in load carrying capacity result from research on structural behavior which lead to changes in design rules. Additionally, the Bridge of Lions’ navigational clearance does not meet the U.S. Coast Guard guide channel clearances.

top.gif (238 bytes)

PROJECT OVERVIEW

This Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been prepared and submitted to obtain location and design concept acceptance for the Bridge of Lions in St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida (refer to Figure 1-1). The Bridge of Lions carries S.R. A1A over the Matanzas River/Intracoastal Waterway. The limits of the project are approximately 0.5 kilometers (0.3 miles) and include the bridge and its approaches. The project extends from downtown St. Augustine to Anastasia Island (refer to Figure 1-2).

This FEIS and its supporting documents have been prepared pursuant to and in accordance with 42 U.S.C., 4332(2)(c), Title 23 U.S.C. 128, Title 33 U.S.C., Title 16 U.S.C. 470, and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. top.gif (238 bytes)

Figure 1-1: Vicinity Map - (click to view)

THE CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE

The economic base of St. Augustine is heavily dependent upon its traditional atmosphere, historic attractions and scenic parks. Tourism is a major industry. As shown on Figure 1-2, the major portion of the St. Augustine historical area and central business district lies between the San Sebastian River on the west and the Matanzas River (Intracoastal Waterway) on the east. West of the San Sebastian River are residential areas and a commercial district along U.S. 1. East of the Matanzas River lays a residential area on Anastasia Island, served by a commercial strip along Anastasia Boulevard (S.R. A1A) extending to the southern city limits. Farther south along Anastasia Boulevard are major recreational facilities such as Anastasia State Park and the St. Augustine beaches.

The Bridge of Lions plays an integral part of the economic stability of the region, serving as the transportation connection between historic St. Augustine and Anastasia Island, and is considered by many to be a tourist attraction in its own right.

Figure 1-2: Location Map - (click to view)top.gif (238 bytes)

HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

Located in the east central portion of St. Johns County, Florida, the City of St. Augustine is rich in historic significance. It was colonized by Don Pedro Menendez de Aviles in 1565 under orders from King Phillip II of Spain, and is the oldest continuous European settlement in North America. Just outside the old city gates stands the Spanish fortress Castillo de San Marcos, a National Monument. Begun in 1672, the fort is the oldest existing masonry fort in the United States. In the 1880's, Henry M. Flagler developed the town as a major tourist resort; his vision began the “golden era” for St. Augustine. During this time, St. Augustine was noted for its temperate climate and unique ambiance, offering wealthy travelers golfing, yachting, and leisurely enjoyment of the beaches.

The citywide fires of 1887 and 1914 destroyed much of the historic attributes of Flagler’s St. Augustine. Despite this destruction, the city retained many features of its long and colorful history and became a center of colonial Spanish culture and an important tourist destination for the State of Florida. An ongoing preservation effort has meticulously restored many colonial structures to their original appearance.1

The Bridge of Lions replaced an older wooden toll bridge built in 1895. After major renovation in 1904, the wood bridge accommodated an electric trolley line. Due to the increase in automobile traffic and a desire to remove an ”eyesore”, work began in 1925 to build a modern, high-quality bridge that would complement the city. The Bridge of Lions opened to traffic in 1927 and connects the historic downtown business district with Anastasia Island. The bascule drawbridge opens to allow the passage of commercial and recreational boats. In 1982, the Bridge was listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

The downtown area has been designated a ”National Historic Landmark”. This designation is made to “encourage the long range preservation of nationally significant properties that illustrate or commemorate the history and prehistory of the United States”. 2top.gif (238 bytes)

Project History

The traffic environment has changed significantly since the 1927 opening of the Bridge of Lions. Over the years, the corrosion of salt water and the burden of carrying millions of cars across its spans has substantially deteriorated the bridge. In 1974, the City of St. Augustine began a study to improve the traffic capacity of the Bridge of Lions. The study was completed but the project did not progress beyond this phase due to insufficient funding. During the 1970's, over $2.2 million in substantial mechanical and structural repairs were made on the bridge by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), temporarily improving its safety and reliability of operation as well as replacing or supplementing some of its deteriorated structural components, thereby altering its appearance.

In 1981, the FDOT initiated a routine inspection of the bridge. The inspection found problems at the underwater pilings and piers and recommended the bridge be replaced. However, further studies into replacing the bridge were halted due to public opposition and controversy. Instead, effective repairs were implemented and the bridge rating was limited to a maximum 30-ton load. The FDOT continued to monitor the structural condition and the traffic growth rate on the Bridge of Lions and the load limit was later downgraded to 15-tons. In 1990, after growing concerns about the condition of the aging bridge and upon request by the St. Augustine City Commission (see Exhibit A-1 in the Appendix), the FDOT began new studies into rehabilitation and/or replacement alternatives.top.gif (238 bytes)

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BRIDGE OF LIONS

Continuing its role since opening, the Bridge of Lions provides an important crossing of the Matanzas River connecting historic St. Augustine and the north section of Anastasia Island. It is a designated emergency evacuation route for Anastasia Island, providing a vital link to safety and ready access for fire and rescue units. Figure 1-3 provides a photograph of the bridge as it exists today.

1-3.jpg (23131 bytes)
Click the image to enlarge Figure 1-3

The bridge is considered historically important on local, state and national levels and is strongly associated with the City of St. Augustine by both residents and tourists. The striking architecture of the bridge is considered an important component of the fabric of the city; the bridge towers are prominent in every skyline rendering of St. Augustine. The bridge light poles fly decorative and ceremonial flags periodically throughout the year to mark major holidays and special events. The following photograph depicts the bridge commemorating the 1996 passage of the Olympic Torch through the historic city on its way to Atlanta, Georgia.

1996 olympics.jpg (32662 bytes)

Above: The Bridge of Lions commemorates the 1996 Olympics.

Economically, the bridge provides a critical link between Anastasia Island and downtown, thus connecting the two parts of the city’s tax base. Without this crossing, the social and economic stability of the region could be damaged. top.gif (238 bytes)

STRUCTURAL CONDITION

Illustrated on Figure 1-4, the roadway on the two lane bridge is 22 feet (6.7 meters) wide and has 5 foot(1.5 meter) sidewalks on both sides. An aluminum post and railing system is used as a combination vehicle/pedestrian traffic railing along the entire length of the bridge. In its existing condition, the Bridge of Lions consists of 23 steel girder spans (16 of which are arched) and one double leaf rolling bascule channel span. The structure is 1545 feet ( 471.0 meters) long and has an overall deck width of 35 feet (10.8 meters). The bridge rests on untreated timber piles, covered at the mud line by reinforced concrete piling caps. The reinforced concrete piers rest on these piling caps and support the steel girder spans. The bridge deck is constructed of reinforced concrete supported by steel floor beams and the bascule piers are protected by a timber fender system. The charted horizontal navigational clearance is 76 feet (23.2 meters); the horizontal clearance from fender to fender is 79.5 feet (24.2 meters). The bridge’s minimum midspan vertical clearance is 24 feet (7.3 meters) at mean high water (MHW). The Bridge Tender’s office is located on the north side of the east bascule pier, while the draw span controls are located on the north side of the west bascule pier.

 

Figure 1-4: Existing Typical Sections - (click to view)

 

The FDOT lists the bridge as being structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. With a low sufficiency rating of 2.0 out of a possible 100, with 100 being in pristine condition, it is a prime candidate for replacement under the FDOT bridge replacement program. As part of this environmental impact analysis, an extensive inspection of the existing bridge was completed by FDOT. This inspection included a detailed analysis of the superstructure, substructure, and the mechanical and electrical systems on the bridge. Divers were employed to inspect the piers below the waterline and on some piers below the mudline to examine the timber piles. In addition, a geotechnical evaluation, including scour analysis, was completed. The inspection revealed advanced corrosion damage in portions of the superstructure requiring the replacement of a minimum of seven spans nearest the bridge ends and implementation of weight restrictions on the bridge. Deterioration has also impacted the mechanical and electrical equipment, both of which are nearing the end of their useful lives. The substructure deficiencies above the foundations are mostly superficial, with the exception of the east abutment where the bearing seats have failed. Other deficiencies in load carrying capacity arise mostly from changes in design rules for steel members brought about by research on structural behavior since the bridge was built.

As shown in the following photographs, the bridge piers are covered with marine growth and the original concrete is cracked and spalled. Scour was observed at nine of the 24 piers with severe localized scour and damaged piles apparent at Pier 4. Evidence of damaged piles was also noted at Pier 5. In addition, Piers 8 and 9 were determined insufficient to carry new design loads. Consequently, these four piers will require extensive foundation work and, in addition, extensive scour protection is needed for the entire bridge. All of the above mentioned deficiencies reduce the safety of the structure. In addition, the vehicular service is considered deficient.

bridge-deterioration-1.jpg (24884 bytes)

Above: Deterioration of Pier 7 as evidenced by the cracked pedestal.top.gif (238 bytes)

 

bridge-deterioration-2.jpg (19654 bytes)

Above: Major cracks in concrete abutment.top.gif (238 bytes)

 

bridge-deterioration-3.jpg (26094 bytes)

Above: Evidence of bridge spalling to concrete piling.

top.gif (238 bytes)

RECENT MAINTENANCE HISTORY

The following chart summarizes the maintenance activities that have occurred on the bridge from 1996 through 2000.

TABLE 1-1
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE HISTORY 1996 - 2000

1/9/96

Navigational lights and aids: Replace conduit on SW fender.

1/8/96

Fender system: Panels 1 through 5

2/13/96

Main girders: Repair cracks

2/13/96

Span locks

2/13/96

Access ladders & platforms/catwalks: Repair hinge on grating system.

6/12/96

Repair cables under bridge

9/13/96

Navigational lights and aids: Replace mid-channel marker light

9/13/96

Fender system: Replace Panel 6 of north fender

12/12/96

Fender system: Repair destroyed eastern-most timber pile dolphin

2/3/97

Deck (Top)/surfacing: Level low area in Span 1

2/3/97

Navigation Lights and Aids: Repair and install electrical conduit on both fenders and Pier 10

2/3/97

Utility attachments: Spans 7 & 8

2/3/97

Fender system: Replace missing & deteriorated wales, catwalk decking & stringers, & wire rope

2/3/97

Access ladders & platforms/catwalks: Secure machinery access platform grating to supports; straighten & secure access ladders leading to fender system, ladders

2/3/97

Decking: Repair welds at various locations to hold down open grid deck

2/3/97

Main girders: Tighten loose nuts and repair cracks in segmental girders

2/3/97

Racks/Rack Pinions; Conduit & Junction Boxes

2/3/97

Navigational lights: Repair missing indication light

3/24/97

Traffic gate: Repair problem

5/21/97

Roadway alignment: Repair and level asphalt at south approach

8/26/97

Generator set/Transfer switch

9/16/97

Repair handrail & parapet on left side of Span 7

1/26/98

Install new independently operated span lock assemblies, new tail lock system and electrical system; Repair transverse traffic beams located directly adjacent to counterweights at Bascule Piers 10 and 11; At Fender System - replace missing/deteriorated timber wales, spacers, and catwalk boards; Replace broken and sheared piling and wire ropes; Repair cracked and spalled areas in columns and wall piers at main girder bearings on Piers 13 and 19; Clean steel H-Piles, install new reinforcement plates and cathodic protection system for the two crutch bents at Pier 4; Repair steel sidewalk brackets in spans 4,5,6,9,11,12,13, 14,16 and 22; Replace handrail anchor bolts; and clean and coat exposed reinforcement or patch concrete spalls in bottom of concrete deck.

2/5/98

Repair brakes, curved/straight track, submarine cable, generator set/transfer switch, main girders, and counterweights

2/5/98

Repair access ladders/platforms/catwalks

2/5/98

Repair span locks, live load shoes & strike plates, sanitary water system & misc. members

2/5/98

Repair handrails/barriers & misc. members

6/26/98

Repair machinery supports on longitudinal I-beam 10-1 and 10-6.

6/26/98

Repair or replace span locks and balance the leaf

6/26/98

Repair deteriorated components of the traffic plate assembly

8/26/99

Installed new shim plates/adjust shoes to provide zero clearance at no-load condition.

10/8/99

Deficiencies in steel grating replaced

10/8/99

Crutch bents installed around Pier 5

10/8/99

Abutment 1 has been augmented with a crutch bent to support the main girders

10/8/99

Concrete pile jackets installed on H piles in tidal zone

10/8/99

All bridge metal rail replaced

10/8/99

Fender system rehabilitated

10/8/99

Replaced the bent & deformed galvanized conduit on the SW fender.

12/26/99

Pier 3 Girder 1 (South girder); Install 4 bearing struts, remove existing vertical angles, clean web plate, repair web, install new angles, repair sway bracing at Pier 18 Girder 1; Add auxiliary bearing stiffener, repair sway bracing at Piers 12,13,15,16 & 17; Repair sway bracing at Piers 4,5,6,8,9,& 19; Repair rack support upright at Pier 10, Girder 2 (North girder); Provide cable support at Piers 10 & 11.

top.gif (238 bytes)

DESIGN DEFICIENCIES

There are also several design deficiencies apparent with the bridge and its approaches. The horizontal roadway alignment at the eastern end of the bridge on Anastasia Boulevard (S.R. A1A) has a substandard curve. The charted horizontal clearance of the main channel is also substandard according to current U.S. Coast Guard guidelines. The existing 23.2 meter (76 foot) charted clearance is below the guide channel clearance of 125 feet (38.1 meter) for structures over the Intracoastal Waterway along Florida’s Atlantic coast. Table 1-2 shows the clearances of bridges north and south of the Bridge of Lions.

The existing two travel lanes are a narrow width of 10 feet 2 inches (3.1 meters). This width does not meet the current FDOT standards of 12 feet (3.6 meters). Moreover, the safety railings are all substandard. To meet current standards, the bridge requires crash-tested barriers and safety rails. Bicycle and pedestrian access is limited by available area and proximity to the travel lanes, with a high potential for vehicular collisions due to the inadequacy of safety railings and the absence of barriers.

TABLE 1-2
BRIDGES OVER THE ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY
NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE BRIDGE OF LIONS

MILE MARKER

BRIDGE AND LOCATION (OWNER)

TYPE

CLEARANCES

HORZ
feet (meters)

VERTICAL

LOW
WATER

HIGH
WATER

27.7

Pablo Creek - Neptune Beach SR-10 (FDOT)

Fixed

90
(27.4)

67
(20.4)

65
(19.8)

30.5

Pablo Creek - Jacksonville Beach
US-90 (FDOT)

Bascule

90
(27.4)

39
(11.9)

37
(11.3)

32.5

Pablo Creek - Jacksonville Beach (FDOT)

Fixed

90
(27.4)

69
(21.0)

65
(19.8)

41.8

* Pablo Creek - Palm Valley
CR-210 (US Army COE)

Bascule

80
(24.4)

13
(3.9)

10
(3.1)

58.8

Tolomato River - Vilano Beach
SR-A1A (FDOT)

Fixed

110
(33.5)

67
(20.4)

62
(18.9)

60.9

Bridge of Lions - St. Augustine
SR-A1A (FDOT)

Bascule

76
(23.2)

29
(8.8)

24
(7.3)

63.0

Matanzas River - St. Augustine
SR-312 (FDOT)

Fixed

100
(30.5)

69
(21.0)

65
(19.8)

71.6

Matanzas River - Crescent Beach
SR-206 (FDOT)

Bascule

90
(27.4)

24
(7.3)

20
(6.0)

86.0

Palm Coast Parkway

Fixed

90
(27.4)

N/A

65
(19.8)

93.6

* Matanzas River - Flagler Beach
SR-100 (FDOT)

Bascule

91
(27.7)

14
(4.2)

14
(4.2)

99.0

Smith Creek - Bulow
SR-A1A (FDOT)

Bascule

91
(27.7)

16
(4.8)

15
(4.5)

* = These bridges are scheduled to be replaced and will meet all clearances.


pedestrians.jpg (28118 bytes)

Above: Bicyclists and pedestrians are not adequately protected from vehicles.top.gif (238 bytes)

 

SAFETY AND EVACUATION

Despite efforts by the FDOT to improve unsafe conditions on the deteriorating structure, there have been a number of vehicular and pedestrian crash incidents on the Bridge of Lions and its approaches in recent years, including fatalities. Table 1-3 presents the most available statistics . Not shown on this table is a fatality that occurred in October 1999 when a bicyclist riding on the sidewalk, fell from her bike and into oncoming traffic where she was repeatedly hit.

TABLE 1-3
CRASH INCIDENTS: BRIDGE OF LIONS AND APPROACHES

YEAR

CRASH INCIDENTS

1991

15

1992

8

1993

10

1994

12

1995

15

1996

15

1997

15

1998

13

1999

9

While the structure and its approaches do not exceed statewide averages for crash rates, the railing system and other substandard roadway and pedestrian elements limit the safety of the structure. The width of the existing travel lanes do not meet the current standards of 12 feet (3.6 meters). In addition, the bridge does not have a refuge or breakdown area to accommodate traffic incidents. These deficiencies will cause problems in emergency situations. Providing improvements are expected to result in decreased traffic-related incidents on this bridge.

The Bridge of Lions is used in the evacuation plans for Anastasia Island. It provides a vital link to safety and emergency response for fire and rescue units. The operational problems with the drawbridge and frequent marine traffic, coupled with substandard horizontal clearances, all play a major role in the inadequacy of the bridge from a public safety perspective. With either of the four build alternatives, operation of the drawbridge will be more reliable.

In order to address these safety problems, the bridge requires rehabilitation or replacement. There are no “quick-fix” solutions to the identified safety problems.top.gif (238 bytes)

NAVIGATION

As shown earlier in Figure 1-1, the bridge crosses the Matanzas River/Intracoastal Waterway approximately 6,000 feet (1,829 meters) south of the river’s confluence with St. Augustine Inlet and the North River. At the Bridge of Lions, the Matanzas River is bordered on the west side by a concrete seawall and on the east side by a small marsh overbank over which the east abutment was constructed.

The Matanzas River navigational channel bends 80 degrees to the east approximately 1,312 feet (400 meters) north of the bridge as it approaches the St. Augustine Inlet. Just south of the bridge the channel bends 30 degrees to the east. The river is approximately 1,600 feet (488 meters) wide at the bridge location and averages about 20 feet (6.0 meters) deep at mean low water (MLW). The deeper portion of the river at the bridge location lies in the eastern half of the river where depths average between 24 feet (7.3 meters) at MLW and 35 feet (10.6 meters) at MLW.

The U.S. Coast Guard will require a navigational permit for the project’s temporary bridge. As such, coordination with the U.S. Coast Guard has been on-going throughout the study of the proposed action; they are included as a cooperating agency for this FEIS.top.gif (238 bytes)

Channel Data

The Intracoastal Waterway channel was authorized as a Federal Navigation Project in 1927 (refer to Figure 1-5). Since that time, no dredging has been required in the vicinity of the bridge to maintain the authorized minimum depth of 12 feet (3.6 meters) at MLW. Immediately north of the bridge, channel depths are more uniform. The deep channel is capable of conveying a significant amount of water to the western portion of the bridge during a hurricane flood event. These conditions create high velocities and produce significant scour.top.gif (238 bytes)

Figure 1-5: Matanzas River Navigational Channel - (Click to view)

Ship Traffic

During the course of any given day, the bridge is required to open frequently to allow marine vessels safe passage. Regulations stipulate when the drawbridge shall open, if vessels are waiting to pass, only on the hour and half-hour from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, with no openings at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 noon, and 5:00 p.m. due to peak roadway traffic. This same schedule, without the peak hour restriction, applies on Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. The drawbridge must open at any time on signal for the passage of U.S. public vessels, tugs with tows, and vessels in distress.

In 1985, 209,000 tons of cargo were moved on the Intracoastal Waterway between Jacksonville and Miami. By 1997, that volume had increased to 424,000 tons. Over the past two years, the volume has almost doubled as indicated on Figure 1-6. Likewise, the cargo traffic passing through the bridge has also increased substantially over the past two years with preliminary estimates indicating 74,000 tons of cargo traversing under the Bridge of Lions.3

Figure 1-6: Tonnage Growth on Intracoastal Waterway - (Click to view)

Over the years there has not been a great increase in the number of vessels but there has been an increase in the size and width. Data taken from a 1995 boat traffic survey revealed that a substantial portion of the waterway traffic is comprised of fishing trawlers and taller pleasure and sport fishing craft and commercial marine craft, all of which require a vertical clearance over 25 feet (7.6 meters). The width of barges using the Intracoastal Waterway has increased from a standard 26 feet (7.9 meters) wide hopper barge in 1980, to include petroleum barges with widths greater than 60 feet (18.3 meters) today. Single petroleum barge tows currently exceed 300 feet (91.4 meters) in length.

top.gif (238 bytes)

 

Ship Impacts

Documented historic accident records have been reviewed relating to ships striking the Bridge of Lions. The causes of these accidents vary from mechanical malfunctions with the drawspan to the navigational restrictions in the channel, especially the limited horizontal clearance between the bascule spans. As summarized in Table 1-4, forty-four (44) ship impacts were recorded between December 1982 and May 2000 with total bridge damages estimated at more than $404,830 (not all cost damages were reported). The bridge has been struck more than any other bridge in the 7th Coast Guard District which includes the Atlantic Coast of Florida, Georgia and South Carolina.

A question raised at a public meeting held for this Bridge of Lions project concerned the contribution of operator error to the number of ship impacts. The most thorough investigation of an incident took place on October 6, 1995 and can be found as Exhibit F in the Appendix. The investigator identified local conditions, age and construction of the bridge as posing a significant hazard. Waterway users have identified the width of the navigational opening, and strong currents as hazards during transit. The United States Coast Pilot advises mariners approaching the Bridge of Lions, “caution is advised because the tidal currents, particularly ebb, run at right angles to the bridge. It is advisable to drift large tows through this opening with favorable currents”.4

 

TABLE 1-4
SHIP IMPACT DATA

DATE

TIME

VESSEL

CAUSE (IF STATED)

BRIDGE
DAMAGE COST

Dec. 15, 1982

6:53 a.m.

Atlantic Endeavor (Barge)

Traffic obstruction

No damage

Jan. 1, 1983

6:15 a.m.

Molly Ray
(Trawler)

Drifting anchor

No damage

Jan. 31, 1983

12:30 p.m.

Captain Jim
(Trawler)

Outrigger was left down

$1,298

Feb. 3, 1983

7:00 a.m.

Victoria
(Sail Yacht)

N/A

No damage

April 18, 1984

1:30 p.m.

Joyce Moore
(Trawler)

Outrigger strike

$683

April 18, 1984

6:37 a.m.

Sally Ann
(Trawler)

Bridge span partially open

No damage

Oct. 7, 1985

2:05 p.m.

Idle Wise II
(Sail Boat)

Bridge operator error

No damage

Feb. 20, 1988

12:35 p.m.

Deep Seal
(Trawler)

Tried to back out

$600

Aug. 22, 1988

7:30 a.m.

Peggy
(Trawler)

N/A

$650

Sept. 20, 1988

2:00 p.m.

LCM-75 Navy
(75' landing craft)

N/A

$5,300

Oct. 14, 1988

10:30 a.m.

Dan Roll
(Sail Boat)

Wind power only through span

Minor

Nov. 26, 1988

12:16 p.m.

Lou Anne Guipry
(Tug/4 barges)

N/A

$5,300

June 4, 1989

12:53 p.m.

Rondan
(Tug/2 barges)

N/A

$13,000

Sept. 28, 1992

12:27 p.m.

C.G. Andler
(Tug & barge)

Turn hard right

$65,000

Oct. 10, 1992

11:35 p.m.

Evergreen State & Ruth Marie (2 tugs/2 barges)

N/A

$17,000

April 8, 1995

8:15 a.m.

Anastasia
(Paddle wheel)

Wind tide

N/A

July 25, 1995

4:00 a.m.

Melanie
(Tug and barge)

N/A

$37,511

Sept. 3, 1995

10:00 a.m.

Gus J. Henrich
(Tug and barge)

Wind tide

$56,266

Oct. 6, 1995

4:12 a.m.

Tread
(Tug and barge)

Local conditions

$46,217

Oct. 6, 1995

8:10 a.m.

American
(Tug and barge)

Local conditions

$7,367

Nov. 3, 1995

11:45 a.m.

N/A

N/A

No damage

Nov. 7, 1995

12:00 p.m.

N/A
(Sail Boat)

N/A

No damage

Nov. 9, 1995

7:45 a.m.

N/A

N/A

No damage

Jan. 6, 1996

12:24 p.m.

Manatee
(Tug)

N/A

111,876

Jan. 20, 1996

3:30 p.m.

Hercules
(140' barge)

N/A

N/A

March 22, 1996

1:10 p.m.

Birdie B
(Tug)

N/A

No damage

May 30, 1996

12:45 p.m.

N/A

N/A

No damage

Aug. 7, 1996

9:48 a.m.

Island Trader
(Tug)

N/A

No damage

Sept. 2, 1996

5:15 a.m.

Antares (Tug)

N/A

$36,762

Oct. 30, 1996

Unknown

N/A

N/A

N/A

Dec. 27, 1996

3:07 p.m.

Sun Chief
(Tug and barg)

Unknown

N/A

Jun. 11, 1997

8:47 p.m.

Lou Anna Guidry
(Tug and barg)

Strong current

N/A

Oct. 25, 1997

2:00 a.m.

Christs Dragon
(Sail Boat)

Dragged anchor

N/A

Nov. 30, 1997

3:00 a.m.

WP Scott
(Tug and barge)

Strong current

N/A

Dec. 29, 1997

8:40 p.m.

My Michelle
(Trawler)

Towing another trawler

N/A

Feb. 19, 1998

2:19 p.m.

Brangus
(Tug and barge)

Strong current

N/A

Nov. 8, 1998

3:00 p.m.

My Turn

Turning in to slip

N/A

Nov. 20, 1998

7:30 a.m.

Just Ducky

Strong current

N/A

Jan. 21, 1999

1:30 p.m.

Bookman Enterprise
(Trawler)

Unknown

No damage

Jan. 28, 1999

1:00 p.m.

WP Scott
(Tug and barge)

Unknown

N/A

April 22, 1999

9:28 a.m.

Sun Chief
(Tug and barge)

Unknown

No damage

Sep. 30, 1999

3:42 p.m.

Gus J. Henrich
(Tug and barge)

Unknown

N/A

Nov. 30, 1999

1:36 p.m.

Lisa
(Sloop)

Strong current

No damage

March 8, 2000

1:55 a.m.

Bateau Mouche
(Sailing vessel)

Dragged anchor

No damage

As a result of the large number of bridge strikings by commercial tows, the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP), in 1995, established limitations on vessel passages through the Bridge of Lions. Tugs with tows were required to await slack water for passage with the use of tugs both fore and aft of a single barge. Subsequently, in 1996, through a public-private venture between FDOT, Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), U.S. Coast Guard, and local tug companies, layup dolphins were established upstream and downstream of the bridge to allow tows to voluntarily wait for slack water. This initiative is intended to help reduce the number of bridge collisions, but is not considered by the Coast Guard to be an acceptable long term solution for transit through this reach of the Intracoastal Waterway. The COTP restrictions were removed and tows now voluntarily wait for slack water; however, these delays may have a substantial long term economic impact on a large number of small entities. The Coast Guard, in a letter to the FDOT (Appendix J), emphasized that the existing Bridge of Lions’ charted horizontal navigational clearance does not meet the recommended guide clearance for the Intracoastal Waterway.

top.gif (238 bytes)

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMANDS

Information from the Future Land Use Element and the Coastal Element of the St. Johns County Comprehensive Plan and the City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan was used to develop population growth rates within the project area of Downtown St. Augustine and Anastasia Island. Population trends have increased 5 percent annually between 1985 and 1998.5 Future population increases are predicted to level off due to the city essentially being built-out, with only ten percent of the vacant land available considered developable.

Conversely, tourism growth continues to increase, after an initial decline in 1990, at a rate of three percent per year. These figures further stress the importance of tourism as the primary economic factor for the region. The tourism statistics are based upon visitor records from the Castillo de San Marcos Fort and the Anastasia Island State Park. As previously shown on Figure 1-2, the Bridge of Lions is the transportation link between these two tourist attractions.

The St. Johns County Department of Emergency Services further emphasized the importance of maintaining the Bridge of Lions crossing in its letter to the FDOT (refer to Exhibit L in the Appendix). When asked their view with regard to rerouting Bridge of Lions traffic to the adjacent SR-312 bridge, Fire Chief McElroy stated that “to reroute traffic to SR 312 would have a negative impact on our ability to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the community.”top.gif (238 bytes)

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

According to the St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan (dated 7/12/99), the future land use plan for the study area shows both residential and commercial land uses increasing on Anastasia Island. Opportunity for future commercial development does exist in the historic downtown area but in the form of infill development of vacant or underutilized buildings. Consequently, the future land use plan shows little change to existing land uses within the study area.

Figure 1-7 illustrates the City of St. Augustine’s Future Land Use Map. Section 3 of this environmental document delves into existing and future land uses in more detail.

Figure 1-7: Future Land Use Map - (Click to view)

top.gif (238 bytes)

Planning Context

The Comprehensive Plan of St. Augustine, TC-Policy C states “Maintain the present street pattern and restore colonial street widths where practical in the area bounded by Orange, Cordova, and St. Francis Streets and the bayfront.” top.gif (238 bytes)

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LINKAGE

As discussed earlier in this section and illustrated on Figures 1-1 and 1-2, the Bridge of Lions carries a combination of local and tourist traffic along S.R. A1A to and from the St. Augustine beaches and the downtown area. On Anastasia Island, from the bridge to S.R. 312, Anastasia Boulevard (S.R. A1A) is a four lane urban arterial roadway. From this point south for a distance of approximately 12.9 kilometers (8 miles), S.R. A1A is being widened to four lanes. North of downtown St. Augustine, S.R. A1A becomes a two lane city street that leads to its river crossing at Vilano. Another two lane city street, King Street (Alternate U.S. 1/S.R. 5A), connects the Bridge of Lions with U.S. 1 (S.R. 5), a major north-south highway traversing the State of Florida. Although routine maintenance is done on these streets, no long term capacity improvements are planned by either the city or state.

Level of service (LOS) is a measure of traffic flow that ranges from a letter designation of “A” through “F”. “A” denotes free flowing traffic conditions with no delays. “F” denotes substantial traffic congestion with excessive delays. The Bridge of Lions operates at a deficient LOS F during the peak morning and evening travel periods.top.gif (238 bytes)

CAPACITY AND DEMAND

Analysis of existing conditions on the Bridge of Lions indicates the crossing is operating well beyond its design capacity, resulting in substantial and costly delays to motorists. The following Table 1-5 summarizes both existing and future levels of service on the Bridge of Lions and its western approaches. Approximately 20,000 vehicles cross the bridge each day. As the predicted levels of service at the west end of the bridge begin to deteriorate, local motorists will begin to change their travel patterns, using the S.R. 312 bridge to avoid time delays. As a result, the two bridges will begin to show a closer balance of traffic as continued growth occurs. This rerouting will be done mainly by and at the expense of local motorists while tourist traffic continues to follow the Bridge of Lions corridor since it connects with primary travel destinations. This pattern of use is consistent with that observed in other locations where knowledge of the local roadway network encourages local motorists to avoid congested locations.

 

TABLE 1-5
EXISTING AND PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE

AVERAGE ANNUAL DAILY TRAFFIC

BRIDGE OF LIONS
(NUMBER OF LANES)

KING STREET INTERSECTION

CATHEDRAL ST. INTERSECTION

2002
(20,500 AADT)

LOS F
(2 lanes)

LOS D

LOS C

2025
No Improvements
(30,000 AADT)

LOS F
(2 lanes)

LOS E

LOS C

2025
With Improvements
(42,630 AADT)

LOS D
(4 lanes)

LOS C
(Timing and Geometric Improvements)

LOS D
(Timing and Geometric Improvements)

If no improvements are made to the bridge and the west intersections, excessive delays will occur. A combination of geometric and timing improvements to both intersections would provide an acceptable level of service. However, the Bridge of Lions would not provide a desirable level of service unless two additional travel lanes are provided. The Build Alternatives assume new traffic signal and operational improvements to the existing two traffic signals on the west approach to this project (San Marco Boulevard/Cathedral Street and Avenida Menedez/King Street). However, under the No-Build Alternative, existing traffic signal and operational improvements are expected in order to maintain an acceptable level of service as traffic growth within the area warrants such improvements. A combination of geometric and timing improvements would be accomplished under routine resurfacing projects undertaken by FDOT.top.gif (238 bytes)

Two Lane Versus Four Lanes Analysis

Future traffic analysis indicates that to the year 2025, the two lane Bridge of Lions will be serving, at most, 30,000 vehicles per day under current traffic conditions. This could adversely affect traffic service on the feeder streets and intersections; possibly being a deterrent to continued economic success of the downtown area. Therefore, from a traffic standpoint, a two lane bridge in this area has reached its ultimate serviceable benefit to both historic St. Augustine and Anastasia Island. To avoid this congestion, additional capacity across the Intracoastal Waterway is needed in the immediate vicinity of the existing Bridge of Lions. A four lane bridge will add the needed capacity and desirable level of service for this water crossing. The 2025 design traffic, coupled with the needed improvements to the signalized intersections at the west end of the bridge, necessitate a four lane bridge structure to meet minimum levels of service. However, due to the street system and the historical context of the area, a compatible system to link with a four lane bridge is not feasible at this time. There are no current plans to provide major improvements on the local street system and local opposition to such improvements is great. Hence, a two lane bridge will meet the need of maintaining this crossing at existing capacity levels. If in the future the downtown street system is improved, then alternatives to provide more capacity across the river will be investigated. It is not prudent, within the scope of this bridge study, to fully investigate or improve the capacity deficiencies of the St. Augustine street system.

SUMMARY OF NEED

The bridge is listed by the FDOT as being structurally deficient and functionally obsolete, and is subject to constant repair. Extensive inspection of the existing bridge revealed advanced corrosion damage in portions of the superstructure, and scour to the substructure leading to the current weight restrictions being placed on the bridge. The FDOT has determined there is a need to provide more than routine maintenance to the Bridge of Lions. This need relates to the importance of the crossing, concern for the bridge’s structural deficiencies, design deficiencies relating to the substandard curve on Anastasia Boulevard and the narrow travel lanes on the bridge, navigational and vehicular safety issues, and other social and economic demands which make retaining this crossing a viable public goal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate ways to solve the existing deficiencies of the Bridge of Lions.top.gif (238 bytes)

IMPORTANCE OF THE BRIDGE OF LIONS

The bridge is considered historically important on a local, state and national level and is strongly associated with the City of St. Augustine by both residents and tourists. Economically, the bridge provides a critical link between Anastasia Island and the historic downtown area, which serve as the tax bases of the city. Without this crossing, the social and economic stability of the region could be damaged. The Bridge of Lions is the only Matanzas River/Intracoastal Waterway crossing in the immediate area of downtown St. Augustine.top.gif (238 bytes)

STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL DEFICIENCIES

The bridge is listed by FDOT as structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. With a sufficiency rating of 2.0, the lowest in the District, it is a prime candidate for replacement. The substructure deficiencies are predominantly scour-related and include the east abutment where the bearing seats have failed. In addition, the horizontal alignment at the eastern end of the bridge on Anastasia Boulevard (S.R. A1A) has a substandard curve.

The Bridge of Lions is considered an important component of the City of St. Augustine transportation system. It is vital that this crossing be maintained.top.gif (238 bytes)

NAVIGATIONAL AND VEHICULAR SAFETY ISSUES

The charted horizontal clearance of the main navigation channel is substandard according to current U.S. Coast Guard recommended guide clearances. The 76 foot (23.2 meter) existing charted clearance is below the guide channel clearance of 125 feet (38.1 meter) desired of new structures over the Intracoastal Waterway along the Florida Atlantic coast. The bridge has been struck more than any other bridge in the 7th Coast Guard District which includes the Atlantic Coast of Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. As a result of the large number of bridge strikings by commercial tows, limitations were established on vessel passages through the Bridge of Lions. Subsequently, in 1996, layup dolphins were established upstream and downstream of the bridge to allow tows to voluntarily wait for slack water. This initiative is intended to help reduce the number of bridge collisions, but is not considered by the Coast Guard to be an acceptable long term solution for transit through this reach of the Intracoastal Waterway.

Analysis of existing conditions on the Bridge of Lions indicates the crossing is operating well beyond its design capacity, resulting in substantial and costly delays to motorists. The travel lanes on the bridge are narrow and do not meet current standards. Bicycle and pedestrian areas are limited and need improvements. The safety railings are also substandard, requiring improvement/replacement.

top.gif (238 bytes)

 

 

Copyright© 2000 FDOT - Site design by Compel Studios